Micro-hole zone technology shows superior ability to empty the bladder: A crossover randomised controlled trial in users of intermittent catheters
PDF
1
page
Get full access with a free account
Benefits of the Coloplast® Professional Educational platform
- Full access to educational content, events and resources
- Track your progress
- Share content with your colleagues
- Share supporting material with your patient
Randomised, cross-over study comparing Micro-hole Zone Technology catheter vs VaPro (a Conventional Eyelet Catheter)
Objectives: To demonstrate superiority of the Micro-hole Zone Technology catheter over VaPro in terms of number of flow-stop episodes and residual volume at 1st flow stop.1,
Population: 42 Male IC users1
Key eligibility criteria
- IC for 1+ months
- IC as primary bladder emptying method
- Neurogenic and non-neurogenic bladder dysfunction
- No UTI symptoms at inclusion1,
Endpoints
Primary endpoints: Flow-stop episodes and residual volume at 1st flow-stop in IC by HCP
Assessments: Haematuria1,
The Micro-hole Zone Technology catheter is superior1 to VaPro (Conventional Eyelet Catheter) in terms of